1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo V70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo V70. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | V70 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2820 mm |