1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Jeep |
| Model | Cutlass | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2916 mm |
