1995 Opel Corsa vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1995 Opel Corsa is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,685 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Opel Corsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Opel Corsa weights approximately 120 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Because 1980 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Opel Corsa (112 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1995 Opel Corsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Opel Corsa | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Opel | Zastava |
| Model | Corsa | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1685 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |
