1995 Peugeot 406 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1995 Peugeot 406 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Peugeot 406 (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 406 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Peugeot 406 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Peugeot 406 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Peugeot 406 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Peugeot 406 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Peugeot | Suzuki |
| Model | 406 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 115 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |
