1995 Peugeot 406 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Peugeot 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Peugeot 406 (135 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 406 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Peugeot 406 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Peugeot 406 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Peugeot 406 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio. 1995 Peugeot 406 has automatic transmission and 1998 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1998 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Peugeot 406 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Peugeot 406 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 406 | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |