1995 Peugeot 806 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Peugeot 806. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Peugeot 806 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1995 Peugeot 806. (92 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1995 Peugeot 806. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 64 kg more than 1995 Peugeot 806. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 806, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Peugeot 806. (200 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Peugeot 806. 2010 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1995 Peugeot 806 has manual transmission. 1995 Peugeot 806 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Peugeot 806 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 806 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 533 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2838 mm |