1995 Pininfarina Argento vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Pininfarina Argento is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,501 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Pininfarina Argento is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Pininfarina Argento (190 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Pininfarina Argento should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1995 Pininfarina Argento is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pininfarina Argento. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Pininfarina Argento | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Pininfarina | Renault |
Model | Argento | Clio |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 62 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |