1995 Pininfarina Argento vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pininfarina Argento. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pininfarina Argento would be higher. At 2,501 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Pininfarina Argento is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Pininfarina Argento (190 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Pininfarina Argento should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1995 Pininfarina Argento is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pininfarina Argento. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Pininfarina Argento | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Pininfarina | Volkswagen |
Model | Argento | Polo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |