1995 Plymouth Voyager vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1995 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Plymouth Voyager (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Plymouth Voyager (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Plymouth Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Plymouth Voyager | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
Model | Voyager | 66 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |