1995 Pontiac Firehawk vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 599 kg more than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1995 Pontiac Firehawk has manual transmission. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Pontiac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Firehawk | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3030 mm |
