1995 Pontiac Firehawk vs. 2002 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2002 Smart ForFour is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk weights approximately 715 kg more than 2002 Smart ForFour.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | 2002 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Pontiac | Smart |
| Model | Firehawk | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2510 mm |
