1995 Pontiac Firehawk vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 129 kg more than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (152 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Pontiac | Renault |
| Model | Firehawk | Clio |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |
