1995 Pontiac Firehawk vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk weights approximately 633 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Pontiac Firehawk | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Pontiac | Honda |
Model | Firehawk | Jazz |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 77 HP |
Torque | 464 Nm | 110 Nm |
Top Speed | 257 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 42 L |