1995 Renault Safrane vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1995 Renault Safrane is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,434 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Renault Safrane (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Renault Safrane should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Renault Safrane weights approximately 640 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Renault Safrane | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Safrane | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2434 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2010 mm |
