1995 Renault Spider vs. 2002 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Renault Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Renault Spider would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Korando (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1995 Renault Spider. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Spider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 860 kg more than 1995 Renault Spider. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Renault Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Korando (318 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault Spider. (186 Nm). This means 2002 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault Spider. 2002 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 1995 Renault Spider has manual transmission. 1995 Renault Spider will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Renault Spider | 2002 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Renault | SsangYong |
| Model | Spider | Korando |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.3 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 70 L |
