1995 Rover 200 vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (144 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (180 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Rover | Simca |
Model | 200 | Aronde |
Year Released | 1995 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |