1995 Rover 200 vs. 1969 Seat 1500
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1969 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Seat 1500 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Because 1969 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 1969 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Rover | Seat |
Model | 200 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2660 mm |