1995 Rover 200 vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Almera. (108 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 21 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Almera. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Almera |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |