1995 Rover 200 vs. 2003 Rover 75
To start off, 2003 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (144 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Rover 75. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rover 75 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2003 Rover 75 | |
Make | Rover | Rover |
Model | 200 | 75 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2830 mm |