1995 Rover 200 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover 200 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 200 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
