1995 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Panda. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2010 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Panda. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Rover | Fiat |
Model | 200 | Panda |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |