1995 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2010 Nissan 370Z is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan 370Z (332 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan 370Z weights approximately 369 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan 370Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover 200 | 2010 Nissan 370Z | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | 200 | 370Z |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 332 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1554 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4247 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1326 mm |
