1995 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 257 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |