1995 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Eos. (138 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Eos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 407 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | 200 | Eos |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1444 mm |