1995 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2012 Dodge Durango is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Durango (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1143 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Durango (528 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover 200 | 2012 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Rover | Dodge |
| Model | 200 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5150 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 528 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2328 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1801 mm |
