1995 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 365 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover 200 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Rover | Ford |
| Model | 200 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
