1995 Rover 200 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 583 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Rover | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1442 mm |