1995 Rover 200 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 744 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Rover | Dodge |
Model | 200 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1482 mm |