1995 Rover 200 vs. 2013 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2013 Toyota Highlander is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Highlander. (184 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Highlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 560 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Highlander (252 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 200 | 2013 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 200 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 184 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |