1995 Rover 214 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Rover 214 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 214 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 214 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 138 kg more than 1995 Rover 214.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 214. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 214.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 214 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Rover | Triumph |
Model | 214 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |