1995 Rover 400 vs. 2010 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2010 Subaru Forester is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Forester (145 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 2010 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Subaru Forester (350 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 400 | 2010 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Rover | Subaru |
Model | 400 | Forester |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1674 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2616 mm |