1995 Rover 400 vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Rover 400 | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 400 | Juke |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |