1995 Rover 400 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 400 (102 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 400 (183 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1995 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover 400 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Rover | Nissan |
| Model | 400 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2449 mm |
