1995 Rover MGF vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 232 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover MGF | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | MGF | CTS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1504 mm |
