1995 Rover MGF vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF.
Because 1995 Rover MGF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Rover MGF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover MGF | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | MGF | Epica |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
