1995 Rover MGF vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 391 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Rover MGF | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | MGF | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 746 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1422 mm |
