1995 Saturn SL vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Saturn SL would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1995 Saturn SL. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1995 Saturn SL.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Saturn SL. (158 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Saturn SL | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Saturn | Holden |
| Model | SL | UTE |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
