1995 Saturn SL vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1995 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 444 kg more than 1995 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Saturn SL | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Saturn | Mazda |
Model | SL | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |