1995 Seat Toledo vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1995 Seat Toledo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 2,324 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Singer Vogue III weights approximately 37 kg more than 1995 Seat Toledo.
Because 1964 Singer Vogue III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Singer Vogue III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Seat Toledo | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | Seat | Singer |
| Model | Toledo | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2324 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1092 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2570 mm |
