1995 SsangYong Chairman H vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 SsangYong Chairman H would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 SsangYong Chairman H. (312 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 SsangYong Chairman H.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 SsangYong Chairman H | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | SsangYong | Toyota |
| Model | Chairman H | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
