1995 SsangYong Musso vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 SsangYong Musso is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (103 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1995 SsangYong Musso. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1995 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 579 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Because 1995 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 SsangYong Musso (192 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 SsangYong Musso | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | SsangYong | Toyota |
| Model | Musso | Celica |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
