1995 SsangYong Musso vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1995 SsangYong Musso. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1995 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 690 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1995 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 SsangYong Musso (192 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
1995 SsangYong Musso | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | SsangYong | Suzuki |
Model | Musso | Reno |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |