1995 SsangYong Musso vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1995 SsangYong Musso. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1995 SsangYong Musso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 SsangYong Musso. (192 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1995 SsangYong Musso | 2010 BMW M3 | |
Make | SsangYong | BMW |
Model | Musso | M3 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1392 mm |