1995 Subaru Alfa vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Subaru Alfa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Subaru Alfa would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Subaru Alfa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Subaru Alfa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Subaru Alfa | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Subaru | Suzuki |
Model | Alfa | Equator |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |