1995 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1995 Toyota 4Runner. (112 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 1995 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota 4Runner. (192 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | 4Runner | F-350 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2366 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3967 mm |