1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser (153 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser weights approximately 1680 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser (391 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Toyota Mega Cruiser | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Mega Cruiser | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2850 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2290 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 64 L |
