1995 Toyota MRJ vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota MRJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota MRJ would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (134 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1995 Toyota MRJ. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota MRJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota MRJ weights approximately 38 kg more than 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1995 Toyota MRJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Toyota MRJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota MRJ (285 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (174 Nm). This means 1995 Toyota MRJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. 2013 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1995 Toyota MRJ has manual transmission. 1995 Toyota MRJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Toyota MRJ | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | MRJ | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1762 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1534 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4587 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2113 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2014 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |
