1995 Volvo 850 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1995 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1995 Volvo 850.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Volvo 850 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 850 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3193 mm |