1996 AC Cobra vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 AC Cobra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda 929 weights approximately 124 kg more than 1996 AC Cobra.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 AC Cobra (579 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 AC Cobra | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Cobra | 929 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 365 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 579 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2620 mm |
