1996 AC Cobra vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 AC Cobra would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 AC Cobra (579 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 1996 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 AC Cobra | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Cobra | Maloo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 579 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |